martes, diciembre 05, 2017


The Rollei Plate Adapter is a very interesting accesory for the Rollei TLR cameras; they use 6,5x9 cm glass plates or film sheets, but the image size is always 6x6. The 6,5x9cm format was popular in the past, but it's difficult to find these plates or sheets size today. Ilford manufacture the film sheets according special orders each year; I bought two boxes with 25 sheets .

sábado, septiembre 19, 2015


The Voigtländer Bergheil was made in Braunschweig, Germany, from 1911 up to about 1941. It was considered a pro-camera or for the advanced amateur. It uses 6,5x9 glass plates or film sheets, it can also use 120 roll film via an adapter. This sample is provided with an uncoated Heliar 4,5/105mm a five elements high quality lens. The bellows can be moved up-down and from side to side for perspective control. The camera is light and very easy to carry. (click on thumbnail).

jueves, enero 12, 2012

Rolleiflex telephone

The San Telmo neighborhood in Buenos Aires city, Argentina, has several antique shops, some of them dedicated to photographic items. Last November 2011 I visited the shop below with my son (he took the images with his digi cam) and we discovered this "Rollei telephone", it worked!!
The Rollei telephone (click thumbnail)

Note the old wood stereo viewer (click thumbnail)

miércoles, diciembre 28, 2011

Rolleiflex 3.5F in the Lanin

Click on thumbnail

I carried the Rolleiflex 3.5F Planar (third version model) in my backpack during our Lanin volcano climbing in November 2011, my son Nicolás surprised me with this image taken close to the shelter on 2600m as the pennant indicates, the Tromen lake is in the background (right) and the little white triangle in the last background on the left is the active Llaima volcano, there is a bit of volcanic ash in the atmosphere coming from the Puyehue volcano. The square images in this Flickr set were taken with the 3.5F, some of them from the same area:

sábado, junio 04, 2011

Rolleiflex SL35M

(Image better seen at the largest size). The Rolleiflex SL 35M has some relationship with one of the lasts Zeiss Ikon cameras, the SL 706. The 35M and the identical Voigtländer VSL 1 BM have the QBM bayonet. The camera has self-timer, TTL Cds coupled lightmeter, DOF preview, double diagonal split image in the vewfinder, hot shoe and PC terminal for flash, shutter cable release, mechanical shutter with focal plane fabric curtain (B,1/2sec to 1/1000sec), it was made by Rollei Singapore from 1976 to 1979 and sold in the black version only.

The standard lens is a Planar 1.8/50 designed by Carl Zeiss based on the previous Carl Zeiss Ultron 1.8/50 for Zeiss Ikon and Voigtländer cameras, including the Zeiss Ikon SL 706. The Carl Zeiss Ultron was an evolution regarding the 1950 Voigtländer Ultron 2/50. The Planar was labeled Color Ultron for the Voigtländer cameras made by Rollei.-
Note: My blog about the Rolleiflex SL 35 System:

miércoles, marzo 30, 2011

Rolleicord I decorative plates patent

F&H wanted to distinguish the first Rolleicord  from the Rolleiflex using etched decorative metal plates shown in the original patent excerpt above (click on thumbnail), the decoration were based on well known Art Decò style patterns. The production camera was made adopting the camera front and camera back patterns for the lateral panels and viewfinder hood too. The Rolleicord I "Art Decò" or "Tapeten-Rollei" in German (Wallpaper Rollei ) was manufactured from November 1933 to March 1936. The patent mainly protected the decorative plates use to finish the camera.

miércoles, marzo 23, 2011


The negative above was taken (Rolleiflex 2,8C Xenotar) and processed about six years ago, it is underexposed very clearly and has damage too. I scanned it several times and never liked the results, anyway they were better if scanning the neg on the scanner (Epson 4490) glass directly (image above); results using the scanner film holder produced a weak image or a blank scan, however I washed the neg again yesterday scanning it on the glass directly (image above) and using the film holder (image below), it was a surprise to me both results were about identical showing them a very slight difference in the histogram (1 point to reach the minimal black point, otherwise histograms are identical); problems are the Newton rings for the image above scanned on the glass directly, it shows them on the subject knee and anothers two rings on the pizza, they are very visible at higher image resolutions, the image scanned with the film holder (below) does not show this problem and then I prefer the image scanned with the film holder this time (both images received identical treatment). Now I obtained similar results  regarding scans for negs with right or about right exposure from the point of view you can't tell the image quality difference if scanned on the glass or with the film holder, the Newton rings are the main difference for this underexposed negative (click on thumbnails for the images largest size).